253.2826 97.6328 253.2826 97.4126 v 282.5789 81.538 282.411 81.7944 282.411 82.4345 c 0.78453 0 Td [(r)20(epr)19(esented and wer)20(e then ranked)]TJ "Long-term subjective and functional evaluation after thumb replantation with special attention to the Quick DASH questionnaire and a specially designed trauma score called modified mayo score." 280.7069 101.8784 l 418.1772 391.6336 420.6436 384.6454 422.4938 377.8624 c "The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH." BT 336.0236 101.9726 l /F11 1 Tf 0 0 0 1 k (M)Tj BT (=)Tj 234.2794 97.4126 l 479.0172 541.1636 l /GS2 gs 321.9371 96.8662 l 450.5499 506.5302 448.2888 510.2298 444.178 513.3132 c 269.4579 93.7924 269.1381 94.3764 268.3859 94.3764 c /GS2 gs (ovided that psychometric)Tj 241.4633 106.853 l 383.1327 103.9807 381.18 100.8979 382.0022 97.1978 c According to Franchignoni (2011), it is recommended that future studies consider revising the QuickDASH. T* 0.026 Tw 389.8546 92.5522 l "Reliability of a visual analog version of the QuickDASH." 264.4176 96.5205 264.6737 97.1445 265.6896 97.1445 c 442.431 515.1632 444.3835 510.3329 448.4946 507.5581 c 368.213 94.684 367.6261 94.0244 367.6261 93.2558 c 288.3954 92.1284 l /GS2 gs 323.0099 94.9233 l 231.6825 106.853 l 365.255 105.0107 365.9367 104.2275 365.9367 103.1474 c 349.3272 90.312 348.465 90.5004 348.3341 91.1674 c 393.4096 150.1247 393.2043 157.1129 393.1016 163.0733 c 252.129 97.6328 252.129 97.4126 v 0 Tc f /CS2 cs 1 scn /CS2 cs 1 scn /GS3 gs ET 408.5172 186.7108 409.2362 186.6076 409.853 186.6076 c 385.2908 205.9287 387.8604 219.9052 387.963 234.0876 c 249.516 96.2597 248.0936 96.2597 y [(Pr)50(operties\))]TJ -0.0002 Tc 428.5572 423.3896 427.0156 404.377 434.6202 389.5782 c 1.08 -2.01999 TD [(lank by the r)20(espondent, you will not)]TJ (2013). 271.1141 101.1181 l (2010). 408.5172 109.5305 l (=)Tj 416.1218 537.7723 413.45 531.2978 410.3667 524.618 c 429.7904 525.3373 427.3239 526.2623 424.7544 527.0843 c 235.0094 101.2026 235.7018 101.8969 236.5558 101.8969 c Q Tj 277.8185 101.8383 l 271.8822 101.1181 l 379.422 91.9506 l 237.1911 96.2597 l 449.1225 302.6637 l 247.4725 90.1792 249.6812 95.9702 249.7918 96.2597 c 408.9278 200.4817 407.0781 193.8018 406.256 187.5326 c s 354.214 104.6118 l 10 0 0 10 468.1954 349.2083 Tm ET /F1 1 Tf Q 405.1255 151.5633 407.3861 148.2747 408.5172 144.6776 c 350.589 91.8852 351.1837 92.5161 351.1837 93.2846 c (At least 10 of the 11 items must be)Tj 434.5175 340.4541 432.7705 336.3434 431.5374 331.9241 c The purpose of the QuickDASH is to use 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. 242.8373 89.3618 m /F1 1 Tf (esponses. 247.7018 106.853 l 315.3908 96.4165 l 238.8883 87.896 l /GS2 gs 277.2265 106.0947 l Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). BT 0.5 w 353.3873 105.5976 l 285.3551 101.9985 285.4432 101.8061 285.9071 101.8061 c 380.9747 134.195 379.9467 135.2229 379.022 135.8393 c /GS3 gs 237.3932 89.0483 237.1911 89.0483 v 291.5157 93.3764 l (Convergent Construct)Tj BT f 348.1095 94.1401 348.8273 94.9956 349.8204 94.9956 c 272.4342 94.5605 m 4.96655 0 TD The latter part of the questionnaire rates your symptoms and impact on work and sport using a similar scale. [(other wor)20(ds, with each new)]TJ "Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches." 401.6311 420.4092 400.2952 430.4804 398.1372 440.7578 c 0 Tc [(mor)20(e than 10 per cent of the items)]TJ 377.254 92.2841 376.4933 91.559 375.4562 91.559 c 410.3667 605.8057 414.1692 605.7033 416.7387 607.2448 c /GS3 gs ET ET 447.9803 424.7254 453.119 415.3734 456.716 405.3021 c 277.1385 84.0825 276.8424 84.6264 276.1305 84.6264 c [(pr)20(oduced. 278.6666 104.8144 m 0.028 Tw 357.0292 139.8475 354.6655 143.7529 355.3849 148.172 c /GS2 gs 247.7018 106.853 l 1 w [(her)20(e ar)19(e two optional modules, each)]TJ 433.5927 260.0884 432.3594 259.5741 432.4622 258.8551 c T* 350.5309 101.9946 l 343.5495 106.8808 l T* 355.8956 103.0893 l 375.7316 101.9726 l 346.5797 101.6464 l 363.0928 126.6929 361.4485 124.946 361.0374 122.8907 c 457.7435 394.7169 457.9493 382.6926 457.4356 371.3878 c 9.99878 0 TD 273.4261 82.7065 l ET "Performance characteristics of the verbal QuickDASH." 10 0 0 10 36 265.96 Tm 252.129 92.0952 l 358.5997 91.9794 l 452.1942 368.7161 451.9885 364.9133 451.2689 361.4194 c 268.6979 104.1264 268.3539 103.8867 268.1139 103.6064 c J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(22): e176. 0 Tw 450.0358 381.9731 m /GS2 gs 37.5 37.4999 537 717 re 0 -1.30001 TD 301.2843 91.3681 l 433.3875 448.2597 434.5175 442.0937 435.7507 435.8243 c 0 Tc /F12 1 Tf 363.7979 91.958 l However, because the full DASH Outcome Measure provides greater precision, it may be the best choice for clinicians who wish to monitor arm pain and function in individual patients. -0.44386 -1.30001 TD 0 Tc /GS2 gs 332.9933 101.9003 333.6168 102.4511 333.6168 103.3574 c 245.1391 97.4126 l 388.6876 91.8852 389.173 92.1391 389.4493 92.5522 c 457.4356 345.6954 452.6052 324.8332 447.2614 303.5601 c (0.73)Tj 0 0 0 1 k 0 Tw 327.3673 94.1186 328.0704 94.9956 329.0856 94.9956 c 321.9371 91.958 l f 366.0245 91.958 l 0.026 Tw 386.8322 92.3569 387.4406 91.8852 388.1945 91.8852 c 284.6351 86.6347 m 389.0934 143.4444 389.0934 137.2782 388.3741 130.4953 c 292.2594 102.7026 m 451.2689 372.8269 l (advantages to using the full DASH)Tj 358.3243 104.2421 359.0138 105.0107 360.0431 105.0107 c 235.7018 98.8042 235.0094 99.4965 235.0094 100.3501 c 429.2763 374.8822 430.0984 374.1627 430.3042 373.3406 c f /GS2 gs h S 333.6818 81.9428 l f ET 333.9943 101.9726 m 377.6388 94.9233 l [(Extr)20(emity Collaborative Gr)19(oup \(the)]TJ 329.3322 101.915 328.6217 101.5742 327.9259 101.5742 c 381.0753 94.5971 m 0.026 Tw 381.7968 134.5034 m BT 287.7633 101.8784 l 395.3623 73.9723 394.4376 72.2249 394.1291 70.3753 c 271.0663 94.3046 l T* 383.6056 102.3354 l 333.5518 94.749 334.0518 94.9956 334.5011 94.9956 c 0.24895 -4.04001 TD 335.422 101.6464 l 314.4191 86.851 l 266.0497 81.6181 l 461.3406 446.8212 457.8465 429.2472 457.3324 411.16 c 418.8967 391.6336 418.2798 392.0447 417.8688 392.8669 c 274.8583 104.8144 l 10 0 0 10 521.4547 645.046 Tm f 0.026 Tw 331.3766 91.958 l 1.94215 0 Td (DASH)Tj 339.0763 94.9956 339.4313 94.8432 339.7579 94.5463 c 14 0 0 14 111.8256 737.0585 Tm q q 17.37722 0 TD -39.61123 -2.42 TD /GS2 gs 0 0 0 1 k 0.80343 0 Td 349.3215 126.7957 354.6655 130.4953 356.2071 135.7366 c f /GS2 gs [(only at these high per)10(for)-1(mance levels,)]TJ 241.9965 90.2075 244.0648 97.4126 y 343.5495 104.3071 m 277.2265 104.0546 l 257.483 96.2573 l (equal to the number of)Tj 0 0 0 1 k 479.6336 627.2848 479.5309 624.2016 479.4283 621.2215 c 327.7296 92.5234 328.252 91.8852 329.0856 91.8852 c 319.3272 84.6543 318.6891 84.125 318.6095 83.4433 c /GS2 gs 336.3859 101.9726 l 238.2643 99.4126 237.5087 98.6567 236.5758 98.6567 c 269.5221 95.1445 270.3781 94.3764 270.3781 93.2163 c /GS2 gs )Tj 273.3541 82.3383 272.8502 81.538 271.578 81.538 c 301.2843 95.1767 l /GS3 gs /GS2 gs S The high correlation between Quick-DASH score and patient satisfaction and functional outcome indicates that the Quick-DASH questionnaire is a suitable tool for evaluating adult humeral shaft fracture outcomes. 389.8126 571.2751 l 0 0 0 0 k [(r)20(esear)40(ch settings and has pr)19(oven to be a)]TJ 152.9747 439.5741 m 316.3839 93.6254 m q 241.6666 90.1752 239.4904 95.9711 239.3822 96.2597 c 396.9039 596.5568 400.7064 601.7977 405.6393 605.6006 c 296.5719 96.5766 297.164 97.1445 297.9561 97.1445 c 336.3936 104.5463 l 273.5543 104.8945 273.8663 104.8066 274.1222 104.6147 c 365.0743 94.0678 l 270.3781 92.0561 269.5221 91.288 268.3859 91.288 c 278.8746 106.4545 l /F12 1 Tf (able to work versus unable to)Tj q 275.7623 104.0546 l (\()Tj 330.4562 91.6318 l (2010). 319.0734 104.6845 318.4357 104.1552 318.3556 103.4736 c /GS3 gs 366.6984 90.312 l /GS2 gs -1.17339 -1.30001 TD 0.95142 0 Td h q /GS3 gs 271.0663 95.0644 l /F2 1 Tf 244.0648 97.4126 l 347.2662 116.6215 345.5192 118.163 345.6218 120.3211 c 237.3932 89.0483 237.1911 89.0483 v -9.21939 -1.30001 TD /F1 1 Tf 387.5518 203.2565 390.4294 215.7943 391.6627 228.3325 c 329.629 102.5673 l 131.252 484.866 238.328 27.634 re BT 417.7661 149.0967 419.102 147.9662 418.8967 146.5277 c 279.1707 94.9126 l BT [(ngoing pr)20(ocess and is context specific. 358.9913 95.583 l 0 Tc [(pr)20(ospective cohor)9(t \(i.e., 200 individuals)]TJ ET 237.3932 89.0483 238.8883 89.0483 y 10 0 0 10 222 449.36 Tm T* 268.538 86.6108 l f Gummesson, C., M. M. Ward, et al. 423.1102 267.282 415.4023 249.0919 407.7976 231.3127 c 243.3966 91.247 244.3026 94.3002 244.5919 95.2749 c 314.4337 91.9794 l 0.032 Tw (onbach\325)Tj -0.53674 -1.3 TD 44.5181 118.4517 l BT ET /GS2 gs 411.8053 149.1995 409.6473 149.7136 409.75 150.9469 c [(average scor)20(e; r \320 Pearson pr)19(oduct moment corr)20(elation)]TJ 0.026 Tw 405.9476 187.3271 405.5365 187.3271 405.2281 187.3271 c Free Online QuickDASH Score Calculator - OrthoToolKit Free Online QuickDASH Score Calculator-- OrthoToolKit About the score Supporting literature About the score developer QuickDASH Score: 0.0 / 100 = 0.0 % Graphical QuickDASH Score: (%) Click here to download a completed PDF report Click here to download a blank PDF report (sum of n r)Tj (eduction)Tj 264.4176 96.0244 l 404.8171 219.2884 403.4813 215.7943 403.4813 211.7864 c ET 283.923 104.0546 l 0 -1.3 TD 384.2633 116.7245 383.8522 115.2854 383.8522 114.1549 c /GS3 gs 0 -1.3 TD 335.2189 84.4296 334.987 84.6543 334.4215 84.6543 c BT 246.3062 89.3618 l 355.171 104.6118 l 398.3426 124.3291 397.9314 124.1238 397.4176 124.0208 c 281.6349 96.3608 l 328.3317 86.851 l 237.1911 89.0483 l 374.42 91.559 373.6583 92.2841 373.6652 93.2631 c ET 288.9154 92.1284 l h (2009). 421.9794 383.3094 421.1573 387.4203 418.8967 390.7088 c /GS2 gs 466.1707 473.541 463.2932 469.225 459.9019 466.3476 c 389.6378 93.4585 m When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary (original) source. 0.51885 0.00001 TD 267.2499 91.288 266.3937 92.0561 266.3937 93.2163 c 290.1873 102.1103 l Gabel, C. P., M. Yelland, et al. q 465.8623 477.2407 466.6845 475.0827 466.4793 474.0552 c [(27.5 vs. 52.6)-11683(M)]TJ 325.9826 81.9428 l /GS2 gs h 1 g 10 0 0 10 243.3623 554.046 Tm /F12 1 Tf 419.7189 127.7208 m (ed using data)Tj 0.026 Tw 330.9054 81.6167 l 332.254 94.9233 l /F12 1 Tf ET 321.0167 96.8662 l (scor)Tj 357.6456 147.7609 358.7762 149.4053 359.2904 150.6383 c 408.3114 226.7909 408.6198 228.5378 409.2362 230.7989 c 0.026 Tw 0 0 0 1 k Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. 265.3378 92.1284 l /GS3 gs Methods We assessed the QuickDASH Japanese version (Quick-DASH-JSSH),6 using volunteers including our institution's staff,theirfamilymembers,andtheparticipantsinthegroup -1.34278 -2.02 TD S /GS3 gs 341.3234 104.9379 l Thr)Tj 435.9565 610.842 439.1425 612.0753 442.2253 612.7941 c (25.4 vs. 48.6)Tj 10 0 0 10 222 671.046 Tm 408.6198 110.4553 m 343.4113 91.6318 l 4.78955 0 TD /F12 1 Tf 419.2051 119.7047 421.0547 113.1274 420.8494 104.4945 c -0.0002 Tc Q [(misfitting items wer)20(e eliminated, and)]TJ 235.7337 89.0483 235.9357 89.0483 v 36 497.055 m ET 0 0 0 1 k q Q 0 -1.30001 TD 323.5324 94.5971 m 250.9357 96.1494 248.7897 90.4638 247.7018 87.5844 c 373.6652 94.2417 374.4268 94.9956 375.4562 94.9956 c 0 -1.3 TD -8.76749 -1.3 TD 406.5645 203.7702 405.8451 194.9323 403.5838 187.2245 c 363.4288 104.6845 362.7902 104.1552 362.7111 103.4736 c f Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Gabel (2009; n=137; mean age=48.4(15.6) years; with clinician referral): SEM=7.38, Polson (2010; n=35; mean age=48.7(15.7) years): MDC=11, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Fan (2008; n=231; mean age=39.5(0.5) years; clinical diagnosis or symptoms present): MCID=10, Gabel (2009):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Polson (2010):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Gummesson (2006; n=105; mean age=52; symptoms more than 2 months):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.93), Franchignoni (2011; n=283; mean age=52.3(15.9) years):Excellentitem separation reliability (ICC=0.99), Shoulder, Elbow & Wrist Arthroplasty Patients, Angst (2009; n=320):Excellenttest-retest reliability(ICC=0.93), Gummesson (2006):Excellentinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.92), Franchignoni (2011):Goodinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.87), Angst (2009):Excellentinternal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.92, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Moderatecorrelation with PCS-12 (r=-0.44), Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006). The DASH Outcome Measure and Quick DASH, as well as a user's manual, scoring instructions, frequently asked questions and research updates, are available from the . 314.4987 96.8662 l /GS3 gs QuickDASH OUTCOME MEASURE INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire asks about yoursymptoms as well as your ability toperform certain activities. (DASH)Tj 0 -2.02 TD 268.09 104.3344 m The QuickDASH is a widely used reference of self reported disability. 448.4946 507.5581 m S ET /GS2 gs 238.2643 100.3461 m h 0 0 0 1 k ET 451.4747 562.0261 443.8697 545.9938 431.8458 534.8948 c and Klum et al. /GS3 gs 0 Tw 248.7897 90.4638 250.9357 96.1494 250.9777 96.2597 c 441.9169 384.4396 438.4231 385.4674 437.0871 388.7562 c 372.4044 91.958 l 0 Tc 0 Tc T* 272.4823 94.5605 l 252.129 96.0405 252.129 96.2597 v 435.6481 443.2242 434.826 448.5681 434.3123 453.7064 c T* (symptoms)Tj 404.9197 165.5398 404.9197 163.4843 405.2281 161.2238 c 410.3667 102.1311 411.1889 90.4153 409.1336 80.8575 c 318.6671 82.3418 319.2765 81.8701 320.0304 81.8701 c 333.7618 91.958 l 282.6349 102.1103 l /F12 1 Tf 403.1727 134.7092 412.9359 132.5508 417.6634 139.7447 c "Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period." 326.1856 104.271 326.9904 105.0107 328.005 105.0107 c 247.7018 99.1704 l 383.1193 104.3579 382.7061 104.6845 382.1554 104.6845 c 286.2752 104.8144 l 278.6828 101.8784 l 367.2931 94.5971 l -0.646 -1.3 TD 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v 0.026 Tw 400.6037 95.4509 399.3705 100.8979 398.8567 105.8307 c 385.4966 171.8091 m [(an 11-item scale was pr)20(oduced with)]TJ The QuickDASH is a shortened versionof the DASH Outcome Measure. 384.2633 177.1529 382.7217 177.3584 382.208 177.8725 c 0 0 0 1 k /F2 1 Tf 1 by U.S. News & World Report for 31st Consecutive Year, Community-Ready Upper Extremity Interactive Rehabilitation, Dr. Lieber To Receive AACPDM's Lifetime Achievement Award for Research on Cerebral Palsy, Global Advisory Services Hospital Training & Consulting, Medical Student Education & Residency Program, Bundled Webinars: Spinal Cord Injury (3 Titles), 1 Year Webinar Package - Unlimited Access, Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand, Making Waves Following a Spinal Cord Injury, Full Circle After a Non-Traumatic Brain Injury, An Unanticipated Head Injury and Incredibly Bright Future. 0 Tw 419.9242 348.162 422.5964 354.6365 423.7269 361.522 c 241.4647 89.3637 l Shirley Ryan AbilityLab does not provide emergency medical services. "Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain." 3.13208 0 TD 332.7614 81.9428 l 360.6232 91.958 l /GS3 gs 5.877 0 TD 0 Tw [(scor)20(e. All four questions must be)]TJ [(items to measur)20(e physical function and)]TJ (calibrated along the scale length. 234.2794 97.4126 l Work -Used for workman compensation patients or those whose disability is affecting their ability to work, Sports/Performing Arts - Used for Athletes and Musicians, Good responsiveness to self-rated changes before and after most arm, shoulder, and hand diagnoses and surgeries, Comparable responsiveness compared to other joint and disease-specific measures. 401.1174 267.1793 400.09 270.1599 401.5284 272.6263 c 326.004 94.5971 l 438.4231 302.6349 448.0834 333.9796 453.4274 365.7354 c 355.6349 104.6118 l 0.59287 0.00001 TD 0.78458 0 Td 265.4337 106.1108 l [4], The QuickDASH is an abbreviated version of the original DASH outcome measure. 336.234 91.958 l 466.7876 479.0909 465.7597 479.0909 465.4512 478.7823 c -0.0001 Tc 0.167 Tc 0.026 Tw /GS2 gs f Q 291.9078 91.3681 l 342.549 91.6318 l 420.6436 99.459 419.7189 93.8066 415.9165 90.5179 c !All . /GS2 gs ET 0 0 0 1 k T* (Quick)Tj 432.8732 372.8269 433.4901 370.8741 435.0318 371.0795 c DASH and QuickDASH Scoring Formula = ([(sum of n responses)/n] -1)(25) where n represents the number of completed items. 253.2826 96.0405 253.2826 92.0952 y 0 Tw f 326.5412 81.9428 l 381.8995 141.1836 383.1327 147.5551 385.9076 153.3101 c 238.1764 96.2597 l 440.0673 377.657 444.4865 377.7598 444.6918 381.4594 c 14 0 0 14 36 737.0585 Tm 366.6622 101.6464 l 435.9565 370.463 436.7786 369.6408 438.1146 369.6408 c 386.6271 187.8409 386.8324 187.2245 387.3462 186.5051 c 361.4561 103.8359 l In the ROC analysis comparing the ability to discriminate much better from somewhat better, the difference in the area under the ROC curves was 0.03, also indicating excellent convergent validity. 352.9962 101.9946 l 0 Tc 358.0343 94.5898 l 0 -1.3 TD [(calculate the optional four)50(-item module)]TJ 378.2257 90.6386 l 0.026 Tw 327.3527 86.5249 l [(alpha ~ 0.90\). 13.90906 0.00001 TD (der to calculate the)Tj [(patients \(r)20(esear)39(ch studies, pr)20(ogram)]TJ 387.6798 103.4736 m 343.1866 101.9726 l 381.4591 104.6845 380.7921 104.2128 380.7921 103.2851 c 0 -1.3 TD 287.7633 104.8144 l h f 327.7296 93.3427 m 313.7882 91.9794 l 341.5846 96.4384 m 288.3954 94.5605 m -0.78457 -1.3 TD "Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire." 274.1222 104.8144 m 324.9894 103.9375 l 424.8575 514.5463 426.5018 502.4194 427.8376 490.3956 c
Best Summer Collegiate Baseball Leagues,
Jack Thompson Obituary,
Articles Q